↓ Skip to main content

Neuroimaging of Rapidly Progressive Dementias, Part 1: Neurodegenerative Etiologies

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroimaging of Rapidly Progressive Dementias, Part 1: Neurodegenerative Etiologies
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2013
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a3454
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.J. Degnan, L.M. Levy

Abstract

Most dementias begin insidiously, developing slowly and generally occurring in the elderly age group. The so-called rapidly progressive dementias constitute a different, diverse collection of conditions, many of which are reversible or treatable. For this reason, prompt identification and assessment of acute and subacute forms of dementia are critical to effective treatment. Numerous other entities within this category of presenile rapid-onset dementias are untreatable such as the prion-related diseases. Neuroimaging aids in the diagnosis and evaluation of many of these rapidly progressive dementias, which include myriad conditions ranging from variations of more common neurodegenerative dementias, such as Alzheimer disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and frontotemporal dementia; infectious-related dementias such as acquired immune deficiency syndrome dementia; autoimmune and malignancy-related conditions; to toxic and metabolic forms of encephalopathy. This first of a 2-part review will specifically address the ability of MR imaging and ancillary neuroimaging strategies to support the diagnostic evaluation of rapidly progressive dementias due to neurodegenerative causes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 132 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 18%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Postgraduate 18 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 65%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,760,689
of 23,837,558 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1,159
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,623
of 195,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#13
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,837,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.