↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Rhythms and Period Expression in the Hawaiian Cricket Genus Laupala

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Circadian Rhythms and Period Expression in the Hawaiian Cricket Genus Laupala
Published in
Behavior Genetics, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10519-012-9576-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. Fergus, Kerry L. Shaw

Abstract

Daily activity times and circadian rhythms of crickets have been a subject of behavioral and physiological study for decades. However, recent studies suggest that the underlying molecular mechanism of cricket endogenous clocks differ from the model of circadian rhythm generation in Drosophila. Here we examine the circadian free-running periods of walking and singing in two Hawaiian swordtail cricket species, Laupala cerasina and Laupala paranigra, that differ in the daily timing of mating related activities. Additionally, we examine variation in sequence and daily cycling of the period (per) gene transcript between these species. The species differed significantly in free-running period of singing, but did not differ significantly in the free-running period of locomotion. Like in Drosophila, per transcript abundance showed cycling consistent with a role in circadian rhythm generation. The amino acid differences identified between these species suggest a potential of the per gene in interspecific behavioral variation in Laupala.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 38%
Student > Master 8 28%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Unknown 4 14%