↓ Skip to main content

Triple Task Method: Systemic, Reflective Action Research

Overview of attention for article published in Systemic Practice and Action Research, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Triple Task Method: Systemic, Reflective Action Research
Published in
Systemic Practice and Action Research, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11213-010-9171-7
Authors

Simon Bell, Stephen Morse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 15 31%
Social Sciences 9 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Engineering 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2013.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#112
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,693
of 97,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.