| Title |
Resistance training intensity and volume affect changes in rate of force development in resistance-trained men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-016-3488-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerald T. Mangine, Jay R. Hoffman, Ran Wang, Adam M. Gonzalez, Jeremy R. Townsend, Adam J. Wells, Adam R. Jajtner, Kyle S. Beyer, Carleigh H. Boone, Amelia A. Miramonti, Michael B. LaMonica, David H. Fukuda, Nicholas A. Ratamess, Jeffrey R. Stout |
| Abstract |
To compare the effects of two different resistance training programs, high intensity (INT) and high volume (VOL), on changes in isometric force (FRC), rate of force development (RFD), and barbell velocity during dynamic strength testing. Twenty-nine resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to either the INT (n = 15, 3-5 RM, 3-min rest interval) or VOL (n = 14, 10-12 RM, 1-min rest interval) training group for 8 weeks. All participants completed a 2-week preparatory phase prior to randomization. Measures of barbell velocity, FRC, and RFD were performed before (PRE) and following (POST) the 8-week training program. Barbell velocity was determined during one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing of the squat (SQ) and bench press (BP) exercises. The isometric mid-thigh pull was used to assess FRC and RFD at specific time bands ranging from 0 to 30, 50, 90, 100, 150, 200, and 250 ms. Analysis of covariance revealed significant (p < 0.05) group differences in peak FRC, FRC at 30-200 ms, and RFD at 50-90 ms. Significant (p < 0.05) changes in INT but not VOL in peak FRC (INT: 9.2 ± 13.8 %; VOL: -4.3 ± 10.2 %), FRC at 30-200 ms (INT: 12.5-15.8 %; VOL: -1.0 to -4.3 %), and RFD at 50 ms (INT: 78.0 ± 163 %; VOL: -4.1 ± 49.6 %) were observed. A trend (p = 0.052) was observed for RFD at 90 ms (INT: 58.5 ± 115 %; VOL: -3.5 ± 40.1 %). No group differences were observed for the observed changes in barbell velocity. Results indicate that INT is more advantageous than VOL for improving FRC and RFD, while changes in barbell velocity during dynamic strength testing are similarly improved by both protocols in resistance-trained men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 14% |
| Spain | 16 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 10% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 63 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 107 | 74% |
| Scientists | 29 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 86 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 58 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#468,216
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#118
of 4,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,982
of 325,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.