Title |
Exploring the Automatic Undercurrents of Sexual Narcissism: Individual Differences in the Sex-Aggression Link
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10508-012-0065-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roland Imhoff, Xenia Bergmann, Rainer Banse, Alexander F. Schmidt |
Abstract |
Sexual narcissism (SN) has recently been proposed to be a specific risk factor for the perpetration of sexual coercion based on both self-reports of previous behavior and self-estimated likelihood of engaging in acts of sexual violence. To explore one of the potential underlying mechanisms of SN, we tested whether for highly sexually narcissistic males (measured with the German language version of the Sexual Narcissism Scale) the subtle priming of sexual concepts would evoke aggressive behavior in a standard measure of aggressive behavior, the Taylor Aggression Paradigm. Results showed that only for sexually narcissistic men did a subtle priming with mildly erotic words lead to an increase in shock volumes administered to the alleged competitor on this task. For women, it was postulated that physical force would not be represented as a functional behavioral script for sexually narcissistic females and, in line with this hypothesis, no effects were found for women. The results were discussed with regard to the underlying processes of SN and the importance of an individual difference perspective in sex-aggression links. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Japan | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 35 | 49% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 33% |