↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular risk factors among long-term survivors of breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancers: a gap in survivorship care?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cardiovascular risk factors among long-term survivors of breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancers: a gap in survivorship care?
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11764-013-0267-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn E. Weaver, Randi E. Foraker, Catherine M. Alfano, Julia H. Rowland, Neeraj K. Arora, Keith M. Bellizzi, Ann S. Hamilton, Ingrid Oakley-Girvan, Gretchen Keel, Noreen M. Aziz

Abstract

Individuals diagnosed with high survival cancers will often die of cardiovascular disease (CVD) rather than a recurrence of their cancer, yet CVD risk factors may be overlooked during survivorship care. We assess the prevalence of CVD risk factors among long-term cancer survivors and compare results to survey data from the general population in the same geographic region. We also characterize how often at-risk survivors discuss CVD-related health behaviors with their health care providers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Jamaica 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 237 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 59 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 74 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,448,436
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#74
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,713
of 197,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.