| Title |
From basic mechanisms to clinical applications in heart protection, new players in cardiovascular diseases and cardiac theranostics: meeting report from the third international symposium on “New frontiers in cardiovascular research”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Basic Research in Cardiology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00395-016-0586-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hector A. Cabrera-Fuentes, Julian Aragones, Jürgen Bernhagen, Andreas Boening, William A. Boisvert, Hans E. Bøtker, Heerajnarain Bulluck, Stuart Cook, Fabio Di Lisa, Felix B. Engel, Bernd Engelmann, Fulvia Ferrazzi, Péter Ferdinandy, Alan Fong, Ingrid Fleming, Erich Gnaiger, Sauri Hernández-Reséndiz, Siavash Beikoghli Kalkhoran, Moo Hyun Kim, Sandrine Lecour, Elisa A. Liehn, Michael S. Marber, Manuel Mayr, Tetsuji Miura, Sang-Bing Ong, Karlheinz Peter, Daniel Sedding, Manvendra K. Singh, M. Saadeh Suleiman, Hans J. Schnittler, Rainer Schulz, Winston Shim, Daniel Tello, Carl-Wilhelm Vogel, Malcolm Walker, Qilong Oscar Yang Li, Derek M. Yellon, Derek J. Hausenloy, Klaus T. Preissner |
| Abstract |
In this meeting report, particularly addressing the topic of protection of the cardiovascular system from ischemia/reperfusion injury, highlights are presented that relate to conditioning strategies of the heart with respect to molecular mechanisms and outcome in patients' cohorts, the influence of co-morbidities and medications, as well as the contribution of innate immune reactions in cardioprotection. Moreover, developmental or systems biology approaches bear great potential in systematically uncovering unexpected components involved in ischemia-reperfusion injury or heart regeneration. Based on the characterization of particular platelet integrins, mitochondrial redox-linked proteins, or lipid-diol compounds in cardiovascular diseases, their targeting by newly developed theranostics and technologies opens new avenues for diagnosis and therapy of myocardial infarction to improve the patients' outcome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Singapore | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,240,861
of 24,067,703 outputs
Outputs from Basic Research in Cardiology
#438
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,726
of 324,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic Research in Cardiology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,067,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.