↓ Skip to main content

Adsorbed and near surface structure of ionic liquids at a solid interface

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adsorbed and near surface structure of ionic liquids at a solid interface
Published in
Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2013
DOI 10.1039/c3cp44163f
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan José Segura, Aaron Elbourne, Erica J. Wanless, Gregory G. Warr, Kislon Voïtchovsky, Rob Atkin

Abstract

The structure of solid-ionic liquid (IL) interfaces has been characterised with unprecedented clarity by employing a range of atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging techniques and tip pressures appropriate for the system under study. Soft contact and amplitude-modulation (AM) AFM imaging have been used to elucidate the lateral structure of ILs adsorbed onto mica, and in the near surface ion layers. Data is presented for ethylammonium nitrate (EAN) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoro-methylsulfonyl)imide (EMIm TFSI). Whereas EAN is a protic IL that forms a nanostructured sponge phase in the bulk, EMIm TFSI is aprotic and has weak (or absent) bulk association structure. Comparison of results obtained for the two liquids elucidates how the strength of bulk liquid morphology effects lateral organisation at the surface, and any effect of IL class, i.e. protic versus aprotic. Imaging reveals EAN self assembles at the solid surface in a worm-like morphology, whereas EMIm cations adsorb in a more isolated fashion, but still in rows templated by the mica surface. To the authors' knowledge, the wormlike structures present at the EAN-mica interface are the smallest self-assembled aggregates ever imaged on a solid surface.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 84 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 34%
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor 4 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 25 28%
Materials Science 15 17%
Physics and Astronomy 14 16%
Engineering 6 7%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,254,701
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#9,162
of 17,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,835
of 292,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#259
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.