You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Projected Changes to Growth and Mortality of Hawaiian Corals over the Next 100 Years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ron K. Hoeke, Paul L. Jokiel, Robert W. Buddemeier, Russell E. Brainard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,730,012
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,180
of 195,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,658
of 109,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#382
of 1,437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.