| Title |
The Triple P Implementation Framework: the Role of Purveyors in the Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Programs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Prevention Science, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11121-016-0661-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenna McWilliam, Jacquie Brown, Matthew R. Sanders, Liz Jones |
| Abstract |
Evidence-based programs are considered critical in the human services field if major social and health problems are to be addressed. Despite the large number of programs that have been developed and implemented, there is much to learn about how to effectively implement these programs in community settings. One perspective that is rarely represented in the literature is that of the purveyor organization (an organization that actively works to disseminate and support the implementation of a program or practice). This paper introduces the Triple P Implementation Framework, developed by the program's purveyor organization, and discusses principles underlying the design and implementation of the Framework. The Framework incorporates two key underlying principles of the Triple P system: minimal sufficiency and self-regulation. Lessons learned from the application of these principles and the implementation process are discussed, along with directions for future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,992,720
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#749
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,013
of 310,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.