You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
To be and to have a critical friend in medical teaching
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Education, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02349.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lars Owe Dahlgren, Björn E Eriksson, Hans Gyllenhammar, Maarit Korkeila, Annika Sääf‐Rothoff, Annika Wernerson, Astrid Seeberger |
| Abstract |
In order to stimulate reflection and continuous professional development, a model of critical friends evaluating each other was introduced in medical education. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,572,409
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#821
of 3,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,327
of 171,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.