↓ Skip to main content

Fish Allergy: In Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 690)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Fish Allergy: In Review
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12016-013-8363-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael F. Sharp, Andreas L. Lopata

Abstract

Globally, the rising consumption of fish and its derivatives, due to its nutritional value and divergence of international cuisines, has led to an increase in reports of adverse reactions to fish. Reactions to fish are not only mediated by the immune system causing allergies, but are often caused by various toxins and parasites including ciguatera and Anisakis. Allergic reactions to fish can be serious and life threatening and children usually do not outgrow this type of food allergy. The route of exposure is not only restricted to ingestion but include manual handling and inhalation of cooking vapors in the domestic and occupational environment. Prevalence rates of self-reported fish allergy range from 0.2 to 2.29 % in the general population, but can reach up to 8 % among fish processing workers. Fish allergy seems to vary with geographical eating habits, type of fish processing, and fish species exposure. The major fish allergen characterized is parvalbumin in addition to several less well-known allergens. This contemporary review discusses interesting and new findings in the area of fish allergy including demographics, novel allergens identified, immunological mechanisms of sensitization, and innovative approaches in diagnosing and managing this life-long disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 217 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 66 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Chemistry 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 73 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#777,091
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#17
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,399
of 195,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.