↓ Skip to main content

Recurrent MET fusion genes represent a drug target in pediatric glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recurrent MET fusion genes represent a drug target in pediatric glioblastoma
Published in
Nature Medicine, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/nm.4204
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pediatric glioblastoma is one of the most common and most deadly brain tumors in childhood. Using an integrative genetic analysis of 53 pediatric glioblastomas and five in vitro model systems, we identified previously unidentified gene fusions involving the MET oncogene in ∼10% of cases. These MET fusions activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling and, in cooperation with lesions compromising cell cycle regulation, induced aggressive glial tumors in vivo. MET inhibitors suppressed MET tumor growth in xenograft models. Finally, we treated a pediatric patient bearing a MET-fusion-expressing glioblastoma with the targeted inhibitor crizotinib. This therapy led to substantial tumor shrinkage and associated relief of symptoms, but new treatment-resistant lesions appeared, indicating that combination therapies are likely necessary to achieve a durable clinical response.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 199 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 14 7%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 61 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 65 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2026.
All research outputs
#475,496
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,857
of 11,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,767
of 337,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#23
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 110.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.