↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Culture of Intestinal Cell Progenitors: An Overview of Their Development, Application, and Associated Technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pathobiology Reports, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 111)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Long-Term Culture of Intestinal Cell Progenitors: An Overview of Their Development, Application, and Associated Technologies
Published in
Current Pathobiology Reports, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40139-016-0119-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Hollins, Lee Parry

Abstract

Long-term culture of adult progenitor cells in 3D is a recently emerging technology that inhabits the space between 2D cell lines and organ slice culture. Adaptations to defined media components in the wake of advances in ES and iPS cell culture has led to the identification of conditions that maintained intestinal cell progenitors in culture. These conditions retain cellular heterogeneity of the normal or tumour tissue, and the cultures have been shown to be genetically stable, such that substantial biobanks are being created from patient derived material. This coupled with advances in analytical tools has generated a field, characterized by the term "organoid culture", that has huge potential for advancing drug discovery, regenerative medicine, and furthering the understanding of fundamental intestinal biology. In this review, we describe the approaches available for the long-term culture of intestinal cells from normal and diseased tissue, the current challenges, and how the technology is likely to develop further.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,839,751
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Current Pathobiology Reports
#25
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,279
of 327,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pathobiology Reports
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them