↓ Skip to main content

High-Throughput Glycomics and Glycoproteomics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'High-Throughput Glycomics and Glycoproteomics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Ubiquitous Importance of Protein Glycosylation.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Laboratory Experimental Design for a Glycomic Study.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 High-Throughput Analysis of the IgG N-Glycome by UPLC-FLR.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 High-Throughput Analysis of IgG Fc Glycopeptides by LC-MS.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Sialic Acid Derivatization for the Rapid Subclass- and Sialic Acid Linkage-Specific MALDI-TOF-MS Analysis of IgG Fc-Glycopeptides.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Use of Multiple Reaction Monitoring on QQQ-MS for the Analysis of Protein- and Site-Specific Glycosylation Patterns in Serum.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Analysis of Permethylated Glycan by Liquid Chromatography (LC) and Mass Spectrometry (MS).
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 High-Throughput Analysis of the Plasma N-Glycome by UHPLC.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Site-Specific N- and O-Glycopeptide Analysis Using an Integrated C18-PGC-LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS Approach.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Analysis of Milk Oligosaccharides by Mass Spectrometry.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 N- and O-Glycomics from Minor Amounts of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Samples.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Carbohydrate Microarray Technology Applied to High-Throughput Mapping of Plant Cell Wall Glycans Using Comprehensive Microarray Polymer Profiling (CoMPP).
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Analysis of Invertebrate and Protist N-Glycans.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 High-Throughput and High-Sensitivity Mass Spectrometry-Based N-Glycomics of Mammalian Cells.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Analysis of N-Glycosylation of Total Membrane Proteins.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 HILIC-UPLC Analysis of Brain Tissue N-Glycans.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Automated Integration of a UPLC Glycomic Profile.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Databases and Associated Tools for Glycomics and Glycoproteomics.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 High-Throughput N-Glycan Analysis with Rapid Magnetic Bead-Based Sample Preparation.
Attention for Chapter 4: High-Throughput Analysis of IgG Fc Glycopeptides by LC-MS.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
High-Throughput Analysis of IgG Fc Glycopeptides by LC-MS.
Chapter number 4
Book title
High-Throughput Glycomics and Glycoproteomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6493-2_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6491-8, 978-1-4939-6493-2
Authors

David Falck, Bas C. Jansen, Noortje de Haan, Manfred Wuhrer

Editors

Gordan Lauc, Manfred Wuhrer

Abstract

This chapter contains a nanoscale liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the glycoform profiling of the conserved Fc N-glycosylation site of monoclonal and polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG). It describes in detail LaCyTools, a program for automated data (pre-)processing of the obtained LC-MS data. The minimal sample preparation necessary is explained as well as an optional method for affinity purification of (polyclonal) antibodies from serum or plasma.After (optional) affinity purification, the pure IgG is cleaved with trypsin. The tryptic glycopeptides are separated almost exclusively on their peptide backbone. This ensures similar response factors for all glycoforms in the MS detection and allows the collection of separate glycoform profiles for different IgG isoforms or allotypes. LaCyTools automatically performs label-free (relative) quantitation of the obtained data after minimal manual input and additionally calculates several quality criteria which can be used for data curation at the level of both individual analytes and entire LC-MS runs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 33%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Chemistry 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,346,264
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,921
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,303
of 420,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#845
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.