↓ Skip to main content

Niche partitioning of closely related symbiotic dinoflagellates

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Ecology, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Niche partitioning of closely related symbiotic dinoflagellates
Published in
Molecular Ecology, August 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03403.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

EUGENIA M. SAMPAYO, LORENZO FRANCESCHINIS, OVE HOEGH‐GULDBERG, SOPHIE DOVE

Abstract

Reef-building corals are fundamental to the most diverse marine ecosystems, yet a detailed understanding of the processes involved in the establishment, persistence and ecology of the coral-dinoflagellate association remains largely unknown. This study explores symbiont diversity in relation to habitat by employing a broad-scale sampling regime using ITS2 and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Samples from Pocillopora damicornis, Stylophora pistillata and Seriatopora hystrix all harboured host-specific clade C symbiont types at Heron Island (Great Barrier Reef, Australia). While Ser. hystrix associated with a single symbiont profile along its entire depth distribution, both P. damicornis and Sty. pistillata associated with multiple symbiont profiles that showed a strong zonation with depth. It is shown that, with an increased sampling effort, previously identified 'rare' symbiont types within this group of host species are in fact environmental specialists. A multivariate approach was used to expand on the common distinction of symbionts by a single genetic identity. It shows merit in its capacity not only to include all the variability present within the marker region but also to reliably represent ecological diversification of symbionts. Furthermore, the cohesive species concept is explored to explain how niche partitioning may drive diversification of closely related symbiont lineages. This study provides thus evidence that closely related symbionts are ecologically distinct and fulfil their own niche within the ecosystem provided by the host and external environment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Mexico 4 2%
New Zealand 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 232 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 26%
Researcher 56 22%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 55%
Environmental Science 37 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 50 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,745,792
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Ecology
#3,134
of 6,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,702
of 76,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Ecology
#25
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.