You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62129-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 269 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 47 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 42 | 16% |
| Japan | 16 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 115 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 199 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 12% |
| Scientists | 25 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | <1% |
| Germany | 9 | <1% |
| Brazil | 8 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Sweden | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 31 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2427 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 494 | 19% |
| Researcher | 483 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 288 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 264 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 144 | 6% |
| Other | 520 | 20% |
| Unknown | 356 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 482 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 473 | 19% |
| Psychology | 330 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 260 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 260 | 10% |
| Other | 250 | 10% |
| Unknown | 494 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 664. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#32,916
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#716
of 42,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145
of 206,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#4
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.