| Title |
How Efficiently Can One Untangle a Double-Twist? Waving is Believing!
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Mathematical Intelligencer, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00283-016-9690-x |
| Authors |
David Pengelley, Daniel Ramras |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 50% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 25% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 25% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,664,418
of 24,271,113 outputs
Outputs from The Mathematical Intelligencer
#69
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,792
of 314,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Mathematical Intelligencer
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,271,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.