↓ Skip to main content

Community Interventions to Improve Cooking Skills and Their Effects on Confidence and Eating Behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Current Nutrition Reports, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
Title
Community Interventions to Improve Cooking Skills and Their Effects on Confidence and Eating Behaviour
Published in
Current Nutrition Reports, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13668-016-0185-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ada L. Garcia, Rebecca Reardon, Matthew McDonald, Elisa J. Vargas-Garcia

Abstract

Community-based interventions aiming to improve cooking skills are a popular strategy to promote healthy eating. We reviewed current evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions on different confidence aspects and fruit and vegetable intake. Evaluation of cooking programmes consistently report increased confidence in cooking skills in adults across different age groups and settings. The effectiveness of these programmes on modifying eating behaviour is less consistent, but small increases in self-reported consumption of fruit and vegetables are also described. Lack of large samples, randomization and control groups and long-term evaluation are methodological limitations of the evidence reviewed. Cooking skill interventions can have a positive effect on food literacy, particularly in improving confidence on cooking and fruit and vegetable consumption, with vulnerable, low-socieconomic groups gaining more benefits. Consistency across study designs, delivery and evaluation of outcomes both at short and long terms are warranted to draw clearer conclusions on how cooking programmes are contributing to improve diet and health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 310 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 21%
Student > Bachelor 64 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Researcher 17 5%
Other 11 4%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 92 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 58 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 7%
Social Sciences 21 7%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 117 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,080,003
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Current Nutrition Reports
#111
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,700
of 315,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Nutrition Reports
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them