↓ Skip to main content

Oxidized single-walled carbon nanohorns as sorbent for porous hollow fiber direct immersion solid-phase microextraction for the determination of triazines in waters

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Oxidized single-walled carbon nanohorns as sorbent for porous hollow fiber direct immersion solid-phase microextraction for the determination of triazines in waters
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00216-013-6716-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Manuel Jiménez-Soto, Soledad Cárdenas, Miguel Valcárcel

Abstract

This paper evaluates the potential of oxidized single-walled carbon nanohorns (o-SWNHs) immobilized on the pores of a hollow fiber (HF) for the direct immersion solid-phase microextraction of triazines from waters. The fabrication of the device requires the oxidation of the nanoparticles by means of microwave irradiation in order to obtain a homogeneous dispersion in methanol. Then, a porous hollow fiber is immersed in the methanolic dispersion of the o-SWNHs under ultrasound stirring. This procedure permits the immobilization of the o-SWNHs in the pores of the hollow fiber. For the extraction, a stainless steel wire was introduced inside the fiber to allow the vertical immersion of the o-SWNHs-HF in the aqueous standard/water sample. The triazines were preconcentrated on the immobilized o-SWNHs and further eluted using 150 μL of methanol. The solvent was evaporated and the residue reconstituted in 10 μL of methanol for sensitivity enhancement. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was selected as instrumental technique. The limits of detection were between 0.05 and 0.1 μg L(-1) with an excellent precision (expressed as relative standard deviation) between runs (below 10.2 %) and between fibers (below 12.8 %). Finally, the method was applied to the determination of the triazines in fortified waters, an average recovery value of 90 % being obtained.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
France 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 43%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4,978
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,929
of 290,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#48
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.