| Title |
Validation of a Loop-Mediated Amplification/ISO 6579-Based Method for Analysing Soya Meal for the Presence of Salmonella enterica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Analytical Methods, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12161-016-0602-7 |
| Authors |
Martin D’Agostino, Susana Robles, Flemming Hansen, Vasileios Ntafis, John Ikonomopoulos, Petros Kokkinos, Avelino Alvarez-Ordonez, Kieran Jordan, Elisabetta Delibato, Elżbieta Kukier, Zbigniew Sieradzki, Krzysztof Kwiatek, Dubravka Milanov, Tamaš Petrović, Patricia Gonzalez-Garcia, David Rodriguez Lazaro, Emily E. Jackson, Stephen J. Forsythe, Lorna O’Brien, Nigel Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,475,157
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#238
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,188
of 363,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.