↓ Skip to main content

Should I eXtract Every Six dental trial (SIXES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Should I eXtract Every Six dental trial (SIXES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Innes, Felicity Borrie, David Bearn, Dafydd Evans, Petra Rauchhaus, Steve McSwiggan, Lyndie Foster Page, Fiona Hogarth

Abstract

Extraction of lower first permanent molars in children is common. There is uncertainty among clinicians as to whether a 'compensating extraction' (removal of the upper first permanent molar to prevent it over erupting) is necessary despite current guidelines recommending this. As a result, unnecessary dental extractions may be carried out or children may be failing to receive extractions required to achieve optimal long-term oral health. In addition, the decision to extract fewer or more teeth affects management options (local anesthetic injections alone, inhalation sedation or general anesthesia) needed to support the child with the surgical procedure(s).The SIXES (Should I eXtract Every Six) dental trial investigates clinical effectiveness and quality of life for conventional treatment (following the guideline of compensation extraction of the upper first permanent molar) compared with the alternative intervention (removal of lower first permanent molars but no extraction of the upper).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 38 25%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 42 28%