Title |
Antibiotic prescribing for discoloured sputum in acute cough/lower respiratory tract infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Respiratory Journal, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1183/09031936.00133910 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C.C. Butler, M.J. Kelly, K. Hood, T. Schaberg, H. Melbye, M. Serra-Prat, F. Blasi, P. Little, T. Verheij, S. Mölstad, M. Godycki-Cwirko, P. Edwards, J. Almirall, A. Torres, U-M. Rautakorpi, J. Nuttall, H. Goossens, S. Coenen |
Abstract |
We investigated whether discoloured sputum and feeling unwell were associated with antibiotic prescription and benefit from antibiotic treatment for acute cough/lower respiratory tract infection (LTRI) in a prospective study of 3,402 adults in 13 countries. A two-level model investigated the association between producing discoloured sputum or feeling generally unwell and an antibiotic prescription. A three-level model investigated the association between an antibiotic prescription and symptom resolution. Patients producing discoloured sputum were prescribed antibiotics more frequently than those not producing sputum (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.1-5.0), unlike those producing clear/white sputum (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.61-1.48). Antibiotic prescription was not associated with a greater rate or magnitude of symptom score resolution (as measured by a 13-item questionnaire completed by patients each day) among those who: produced yellow (coefficient 0.00; p = 0.68) or green (coefficient -0.01; p = 0.11) sputum; reported any of three categories of feeling unwell; or produced discoloured sputum and felt generally unwell (coefficient -0.01; p = 0.19). Adults with acute cough/LRTI presenting in primary care settings with discoloured sputum were prescribed antibiotics more often compared to those not producing sputum. Sputum colour, alone or together with feeling generally unwell, was not associated with recovery or benefit from antibiotic treatment. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
Other | 15 | 20% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 45% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 21% |