| Title |
Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuaries and Coasts, August 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02804901 |
| Authors |
Donald M. Anderson, Patricia M. Glibert, Joann M. Burkholder |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2410 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 467 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 463 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 414 | 16% |
| Researcher | 325 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 109 | 4% |
| Other | 273 | 11% |
| Unknown | 461 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 703 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 650 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 187 | 7% |
| Engineering | 123 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 98 | 4% |
| Other | 193 | 8% |
| Unknown | 558 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#860,560
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#22
of 1,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#651
of 48,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,879 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.