You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
弥生時代の戦闘戦術
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association), November 2004
|
| DOI | 10.11215/nihonkokogaku1994.11.18_37 |
| Authors |
藤原 哲 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 29 | 21% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Andorra | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 140 | 99% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#379,607
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association)
#1
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#395
of 75,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association)
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them