↓ Skip to main content

Brain Anatomical Network and Intelligence

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
526 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
587 Mendeley
citeulike
13 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain Anatomical Network and Intelligence
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yonghui Li, Yong Liu, Jun Li, Wen Qin, Kuncheng Li, Chunshui Yu, Tianzi Jiang

Abstract

Intuitively, higher intelligence might be assumed to correspond to more efficient information transfer in the brain, but no direct evidence has been reported from the perspective of brain networks. In this study, we performed extensive analyses to test the hypothesis that individual differences in intelligence are associated with brain structural organization, and in particular that higher scores on intelligence tests are related to greater global efficiency of the brain anatomical network. We constructed binary and weighted brain anatomical networks in each of 79 healthy young adults utilizing diffusion tensor tractography and calculated topological properties of the networks using a graph theoretical method. Based on their IQ test scores, all subjects were divided into general and high intelligence groups and significantly higher global efficiencies were found in the networks of the latter group. Moreover, we showed significant correlations between IQ scores and network properties across all subjects while controlling for age and gender. Specifically, higher intelligence scores corresponded to a shorter characteristic path length and a higher global efficiency of the networks, indicating a more efficient parallel information transfer in the brain. The results were consistently observed not only in the binary but also in the weighted networks, which together provide convergent evidence for our hypothesis. Our findings suggest that the efficiency of brain structural organization may be an important biological basis for intelligence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 7 1%
China 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 541 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 145 25%
Researcher 101 17%
Student > Master 81 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 31 5%
Other 115 20%
Unknown 72 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 114 19%
Neuroscience 86 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 11%
Engineering 41 7%
Other 96 16%
Unknown 113 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,596,844
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,365
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,951
of 125,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.