↓ Skip to main content

Semi-Automated Neuron Boundary Detection and Nonbranching Process Segmentation in Electron Microscopy Images

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Semi-Automated Neuron Boundary Detection and Nonbranching Process Segmentation in Electron Microscopy Images
Published in
Neuroinformatics, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12021-012-9149-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Jurrus, Shigeki Watanabe, Richard J. Giuly, Antonio R. C. Paiva, Mark H. Ellisman, Erik M. Jorgensen, Tolga Tasdizen

Abstract

Neuroscientists are developing new imaging techniques and generating large volumes of data in an effort to understand the complex structure of the nervous system. The complexity and size of this data makes human interpretation a labor-intensive task. To aid in the analysis, new segmentation techniques for identifying neurons in these feature rich datasets are required. This paper presents a method for neuron boundary detection and nonbranching process segmentation in electron microscopy images and visualizing them in three dimensions. It combines both automated segmentation techniques with a graphical user interface for correction of mistakes in the automated process. The automated process first uses machine learning and image processing techniques to identify neuron membranes that deliniate the cells in each two-dimensional section. To segment nonbranching processes, the cell regions in each two-dimensional section are connected in 3D using correlation of regions between sections. The combination of this method with a graphical user interface specially designed for this purpose, enables users to quickly segment cellular processes in large volumes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 4%
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Computer Science 14 18%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Physics and Astronomy 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,101,787
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#215
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,262
of 165,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.