↓ Skip to main content

Mapping of groundwater potential zones across Ghana using remote sensing, geographic information systems, and spatial modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Mapping of groundwater potential zones across Ghana using remote sensing, geographic information systems, and spatial modeling
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10661-012-2810-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Murali Krishna Gumma, Paul Pavelic

Abstract

Groundwater development across much of sub-Saharan Africa is constrained by a lack of knowledge on the suitability of aquifers for borehole construction. The main objective of this study was to map groundwater potential at the country-scale for Ghana to identify locations for developing new supplies that could be used for a range of purposes. Groundwater potential zones were delineated using remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) techniques drawing from a database that includes climate, geology, and satellite data. Subjective scores and weights were assigned to each of seven key spatial data layers and integrated to identify groundwater potential according to five categories ranging from very good to very poor derived from the total percentage score. From this analysis, areas of very good groundwater potential are estimated to cover 689,680 ha (2.9 % of the country), good potential 5,158,955 ha (21.6 %), moderate potential 10,898,140 ha (45.6 %), and poor/very poor potential 7,167,713 ha (30 %). The results were independently tested against borehole yield data (2,650 measurements) which conformed to the anticipated trend between groundwater potential and borehole yield. The satisfactory delineation of groundwater potential zones through spatial modeling suggests that groundwater development should first focus on areas of the highest potential. This study demonstrates the importance of remote sensing and GIS techniques in mapping groundwater potential at the country-scale and suggests that similar methods could be applied across other African countries and regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 222 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 59 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 18%
Engineering 42 18%
Environmental Science 36 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Unspecified 9 4%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 68 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,172,769
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#1,407
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,258
of 150,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#16
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.