You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using structured decision making to manage disease risk for Montana wildlife
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wsb.237 |
| Authors |
Michael S. Mitchell, Justin A. Gude, Neil J. Anderson, Jennifer M. Ramsey, Michael J. Thompson, Mark G. Sullivan, Victoria L. Edwards, Claire N. Gower, Jean Fitts Cochrane, Elise R. Irwin, Terry Walshe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Virgin Islands, U.S. | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 25% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#769
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,292
of 288,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.