| Title |
Learning classifier systems: then and now
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Intelligence, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12065-007-0003-3 |
| Authors |
Pier Luca Lanzi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 31% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 37 | 64% |
| Engineering | 9 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,489,401
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Intelligence
#13
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,790
of 156,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Intelligence
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 37 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.