↓ Skip to main content

Influences on diet quality in older age: the importance of social factors

Overview of attention for article published in Age & Ageing, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influences on diet quality in older age: the importance of social factors
Published in
Age & Ageing, October 2016
DOI 10.1093/ageing/afw180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilse Bloom, Mark Edwards, Karen A. Jameson, Holly E. Syddall, Elaine Dennison, Catharine R. Gale, Janis Baird, Cyrus Cooper, Avan Aihie Sayer, Sian Robinson

Abstract

poor diet quality is common among older people, but little is known about influences on food choice, including the role of psychosocial factors at this age. to identify psychosocial correlates of diet quality in a community-dwelling population of men and women aged 59-73 years; to describe relationships with change in diet quality over 10 years. Longitudinal cohort, Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS). HCS participants assessed at baseline (1998-2003: 1,048 men, 862 women); 183 men and 189 women re-assessed in 2011. diet was assessed by administered food frequency questionnaire; diet scores were calculated to describe diet quality at baseline and follow-up. A range of psychosocial factors (social support, social network, participation in leisure activities, depression and anxiety, sense of control) were assessed by questionnaire. at baseline, better diet quality was related to a range of social factors, including increased confiding/emotional social support (men and women), practical support (men) and a larger social network (women) (all P < 0.05). For both men and women, greater participation in social and cognitive leisure activities was related to better diet quality (P < 0.005). There were few associations between measured psychosocial factors at baseline and change in diet score over 10 years, in the follow-up sub-group. However, greater participation in leisure activities, especially cognitive activities, at baseline was associated with smaller declines in diet quality over the 10-year follow-up period for both men (P = 0.017) and women (P = 0.014). in community-dwelling older adults, a range of social factors, that includes greater participation in leisure activities, were associated with diets of better quality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 55 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 16%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 64 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,705,896
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#1,189
of 3,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,871
of 325,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#29
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.