↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary function and sputum characteristics predict computed tomography phenotype and severity of COPD

Overview of attention for article published in European Respiratory Journal, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary function and sputum characteristics predict computed tomography phenotype and severity of COPD
Published in
European Respiratory Journal, December 2012
DOI 10.1183/09031936.00133112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianna Camiciottoli, Francesca Bigazzi, Matteo Paoletti, Lucia Cestelli, Federico Lavorini, Massimo Pistolesi

Abstract

Airway obstruction and parenchymal destruction underlie phenotype and severity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to predict, by clinical and pulmonary function data, the predominant type and severity of pathological changes quantitatively assessed by computed tomography (CT). Airway wall thickness (AWT-Pi10) and percentage of lung area with X-ray attenuation values <-950 HU (%LAA-950) were measured in 100 (learning set) out of 473 COPD outpatients undergoing clinical and functional evaluation. Original CT measurements were translated by principal component analysis onto a plane with the novel coordinates CT1 and CT2, depending on the difference (prevalent mechanism of airflow limitation) and on the sum (severity) of AWT-Pi10 and %LAA-950, respectively. CT1 and CT2, estimated in the learning set by cross-validated models of clinical and functional variables, were used to classify 373 patients in the testing set. A model based on diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, total lung capacity and purulent sputum predicted CT1 (r = 0.64; p<0.01). A model based on forced expiratory volume in 1 s/vital capacity, functional residual capacity and purulent sputum predicted CT2 (r = 0.77; p<0.01). Classification of patients in the testing set obtained by model-predicted CT1 and CT2 reflected, according to correlations with clinical and functional variables, both COPD phenotype and severity. Multivariate models based on pulmonary function variables and sputum purulence classify patients according to overall severity and predominant phenotype of COPD as assessed quantitatively by CT.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 60%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,265,264
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from European Respiratory Journal
#6,721
of 8,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,281
of 280,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Respiratory Journal
#60
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.