↓ Skip to main content

Medications influencing central cholinergic neurotransmission affect saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements in healthy young adults

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Medications influencing central cholinergic neurotransmission affect saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements in healthy young adults
Published in
Psychopharmacology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00213-016-4436-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Preshanta Naicker, Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie, Gary D. Grant, Justin J. Kavanagh

Abstract

Acetylcholine is an important neuromodulator in the central nervous system, where it plays a significant role in central functions such as the regulation of movement. This study investigated the pharmacological effects of over-the-counter anticholinergic medications on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements, in order to establish the significance of central cholinergic pathways in the control of these centrally regulated oculomotor processes. Sixteen subjects (mean age 23 ± 3 years, 9 females) performed pro-saccadic, anti-saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movement tests, while an eye tracker collected eye movement data. Oculomotor assessments were performed pre-ingestion, 0.5 and 2 h post-ingestion of drugs with varying degrees of central anticholinergic properties. The drugs tested were promethazine, hyoscine hydrobromide, hyoscine butylbromide and placebo. The drug intervention with stronger central anticholinergic properties, promethazine, decreased amplitude and increased velocity in the pro-saccadic task and increased duration in the anti-saccadic task. Promethazine, once again, was the only drug to decrease eye velocity in the smooth pursuit test. The prominent effects of the stronger central anticholinergic promethazine, on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements, potentially conveys the significance of central cholinergic pathways in the control of these centrally regulated oculomotor processes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,346,264
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#4,938
of 5,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,183
of 322,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#40
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.