↓ Skip to main content

Tales of Plagues and Carnivals: Samuel R. Delany, AIDS, and the Grammar of Dissent

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Humanities, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Tales of Plagues and Carnivals: Samuel R. Delany, AIDS, and the Grammar of Dissent
Published in
Journal of Medical Humanities, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10912-013-9209-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Lawrence Long

Abstract

While even today lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people might have cause to distrust the healthcare establishment, how much more fragile was the relationship between sexual minorities and health professionals in the first decade of the AIDS epidemic. Dissent from consensus healthcare and health research then was a question of survival in the face of political and medical intransigence. This article focuses on one version of AIDS dissent: The narrative representations of AIDS in fiction by the gay African-American fantasy writer Samuel R. Delany, which rejected the rigid binarism of "safe" and "unsafe" sex practices, Delany's evidence-based dissent. He also engaged in a related form of cultural dissent: speaking the unspeakably obscene, at a time when Silence = Death. Delany called into question both the inferential leaps based on limited epidemiological research that were represented in safer sex guidelines and the widespread public reticence about sexual behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 35%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Psychology 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,453,568
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Humanities
#137
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,893
of 205,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Humanities
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.