↓ Skip to main content

Postembryonic development of the bone-eating worm Osedax japonicus

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Postembryonic development of the bone-eating worm Osedax japonicus
Published in
The Science of Nature, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00114-013-1024-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norio Miyamoto, Tomoko Yamamoto, Yoichi Yusa, Yoshihiro Fujiwara

Abstract

Bone-eating worms of the genus Osedax exclusively inhabit sunken vertebrate bones on the seafloor. The unique lifestyle and morphology of Osedax spp. have received much scientific attention, but the whole process of their development has not been observed. We herein report the postembryonic development and settlement of Osedax japonicus Fujikura et al. (Zool Sci 23:733-740, 2006). Fertilised eggs were spawned into the mucus of a female, and the larvae swam out from the mucus at the trochophore stage. Larvae survived for 10 days under laboratory conditions. The larvae settled on bones, elongated their bodies and crawled around on the bones. Then they secreted mucus to create a tube and the palps started to develop. The palps of O. japonicus arose from the prostomium, whereas the anterior appendages of other siboglinids arose from the peristomium. The recruitment of dwarf males was induced by rearing larvae with adult females. Females started to spawn eggs 6 weeks after settlement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 58%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,353,839
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#189
of 2,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,907
of 205,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.