↓ Skip to main content

Music can elicit a visual motion aftereffect

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Music can elicit a visual motion aftereffect
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, March 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13414-013-0443-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen C. Hedger, Howard C. Nusbaum, Olivier Lescop, Pascal Wallisch, Berthold Hoeckner

Abstract

Motion aftereffects (MAEs) are thought to result from the adaptation of both subcortical and cortical systems involved in the processing of visual motion. Recently, it has been reported that the implied motion of static images in combination with linguistic descriptions of motion is sufficient to elicit an MAE, although neither factor alone is thought to directly activate visual motion areas in the brain. Given that the monotonic change of musical pitch is widely recognized in music as a metaphor for vertical motion, we investigated whether prolonged exposure to ascending or descending musical scales can also produce a visual motion aftereffect. After listening to ascending or descending musical scales, participants made decisions about the direction of visual motion in random-dot kinematogram stimuli. Metaphoric motion in the musical stimuli did affect the visual direction judgments, in that repeated exposure to rising or falling musical scales shifted participants' sensitivity to visual motion in the opposite direction. The finding that music can induce an MAE suggests that the subjective interpretation of monotonic pitch change as motion may have a perceptual foundation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 54%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Engineering 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,624,698
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#53
of 1,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,176
of 199,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.