↓ Skip to main content

Trace gluten contamination may play a role in mucosal and clinical recovery in a subgroup of diet-adherent non-responsive celiac disease patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 1,819)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Trace gluten contamination may play a role in mucosal and clinical recovery in a subgroup of diet-adherent non-responsive celiac disease patients
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-13-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin R Hollon, Pamela A Cureton, Margaret L Martin, Elaine L Leonard Puppa, Alessio Fasano

Abstract

Patients with persistent symptoms and/or villous atrophy despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) have non-responsive celiac disease (NRCD). A subset of these patients has refractory celiac disease (RCD), yet some NRCD patients may simply be reacting to gluten cross-contamination. Here we describe the effects of a 3-6 month diet of whole, unprocessed foods, termed the Gluten Contamination Elimination Diet (GCED), on NRCD. We aim to demonstrate that this diet reclassifies the majority of patients thought to have RCD type 1 (RCD1).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#907,413
of 23,782,909 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#43
of 1,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,543
of 195,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,782,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.