You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
White-nose syndrome is likely to extirpate the endangered Indiana bat over large parts of its range
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.010 |
| Authors |
Wayne E. Thogmartin, Carol A. Sanders-Reed, Jennifer A. Szymanski, Patrick C. McKann, Lori Pruitt, R. Andrew King, Michael C. Runge, Robin E. Russell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 38 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,232,793
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,805
of 6,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,078
of 217,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#23
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.