↓ Skip to main content

Use of standardised assessment forms in referrals to hepatology outpatient services: implications for accurate triaging of patients with chronic hepatitis C

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Health Review, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of standardised assessment forms in referrals to hepatology outpatient services: implications for accurate triaging of patients with chronic hepatitis C
Published in
Australian Health Review, March 2013
DOI 10.1071/ah12162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leigh Horsfall, Graeme Macdonald, Ian Scott, Richard Skoien, Mohsina Khatun, Cathy Moss, Clare Seligman, Christine Kardash, Vicki Poxon, Elizabeth E. Powell

Abstract

To determine the spectrum of disease among non-urgent referrals to a tertiary hospital hepatology outpatient clinic, assess the adequacy of referral information in terms of risk stratification and determine whether a specifically designed referral template altered urgency for specialist assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Psychology 4 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%