| Title |
Accuracy of spinal orthopaedic tests: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-1340-14-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rob Simpson, Hugh Gemmell |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature on the accuracy of orthopaedic tests for the spine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |