↓ Skip to main content

Novel infectious agents causing uveitis

Overview of attention for article published in International Ophthalmology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 1,030)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Novel infectious agents causing uveitis
Published in
International Ophthalmology, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10792-009-9319-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moncef Khairallah, Soon Phaik Chee, Sivakumar R. Rathinam, Sonia Attia, Venu Nadella

Abstract

In any patient with uveitis, an infectious cause should be ruled out first. The differential diagnosis includes multiple well-known diseases including herpes, syphilis, toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis, bartonellosis, Lyme disease, and others. However, clinician should be aware of emerging infectious agents as potential causes of systemic illness and also intraocular inflammation. Air travel, immigration, and globalization of business have overturned traditional pattern of geographic distribution of infectious diseases, and therefore one should work locally but think globally. This review recapitulates the systemic and ocular manifestations of several emergent infectious diseases relevant to the ophthalmologist including Rickettsioses, West Nile virus infection, Rift valley fever, Dengue fever, and Chikungunya. Retinitis, chorioretinitis, retinal vasculitis, and optic nerve involvement have been associated with these emergent infectious diseases. The diagnosis of any of these infections is usually based on pattern of uveitis, systemic symptoms and signs, and specific epidemiological data and confirmed by detection of specific antibody in serum. A systematic ocular examination, showing fairly typical fundus findings, may help establish an early clinical diagnosis, which allows prompt, appropriate management.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 21%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 15%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,651,008
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#37
of 1,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,029
of 90,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them