You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effects of Strontium Ranelate on the Risk of Vertebral Fracture in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa022436 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre J. Meunier, Christian Roux, Ego Seeman, Sergio Ortolani, Janusz E. Badurski, Tim D. Spector, Jorge Cannata, Adam Balogh, Ernst-Martin Lemmel, Stig Pors-Nielsen, René Rizzoli, Harry K. Genant, Jean-Yves Reginster |
| Abstract |
Osteoporotic structural damage and bone fragility result from reduced bone formation and increased bone resorption. In a phase 2 clinical trial, strontium ranelate, an orally active drug that dissociates bone remodeling by increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, has been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral fractures and to increase bone mineral density. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 311 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 14% |
| Researcher | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 90 | 27% |
| Unknown | 55 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 21 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 6% |
| Engineering | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,385,866
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#14,617
of 32,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,552
of 147,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#47
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.