| Title |
Assessing the merits of bioenergy by estimating marginal climate-change impacts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-016-1196-4 |
| Authors |
Miko U.F. Kirschbaum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Engineering | 5 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#5,914,153
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#333
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,346
of 334,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.