↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Reduction in Peripheral Blood HIV Type 1 Reservoirs Following Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-Term Reduction in Peripheral Blood HIV Type 1 Reservoirs Following Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, March 2013
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jit086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy J. Henrich, Zixin Hu, Jonathan Z. Li, Gaia Sciaranghella, Michael P. Busch, Sheila M. Keating, Sebastien Gallien, Nina H. Lin, Francoise F. Giguel, Laura Lavoie, Vincent T. Ho, Philippe Armand, Robert J. Soiffer, Manish Sagar, Ann S. LaCasce, Daniel R. Kuritzkes

Abstract

The long-term impact of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reservoirs in patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is largely unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Denmark 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Master 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 9%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,202,895
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#894
of 14,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,805
of 207,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#11
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.