↓ Skip to main content

UK health performance: findings of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
7 policy sources
twitter
249 X users
facebook
22 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
487 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1071 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
UK health performance: findings of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Published in
The Lancet, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60355-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher JL Murray, Michael A Richards, John N Newton, Kevin A Fenton, H Ross Anderson, Charles Atkinson, Derrick Bennett, Eduardo Bernabé, Hannah Blencowe, Rupert Bourne, Tasanee Braithwaite, Carol Brayne, Nigel G Bruce, Traolach S Brugha, Peter Burney, Mukesh Dherani, Helen Dolk, Karen Edmond, Majid Ezzati, Abraham D Flaxman, Tom D Fleming, Greg Freedman, David Gunnell, Roderick J Hay, Sally J Hutchings, Summer Lockett Ohno, Rafael Lozano, Ronan A Lyons, Wagner Marcenes, Mohsen Naghavi, Charles R Newton, Neil Pearce, Dan Pope, Lesley Rushton, Joshua A Salomon, Kenji Shibuya, Theo Vos, Haidong Wang, Hywel C Williams, Anthony D Woolf, Alan D Lopez, Adrian Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 249 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,071 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 26 2%
Canada 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1024 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 167 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 155 14%
Researcher 132 12%
Student > Bachelor 107 10%
Other 80 7%
Other 221 21%
Unknown 209 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 370 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 98 9%
Social Sciences 68 6%
Psychology 55 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 4%
Other 186 17%
Unknown 249 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 382. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#82,240
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,260
of 43,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#438
of 211,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#9
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.