↓ Skip to main content

From deep sequencing to viral tagging: Recent advances in viral metagenomics

Overview of attention for article published in BioEssays, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From deep sequencing to viral tagging: Recent advances in viral metagenomics
Published in
BioEssays, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/bies.201200174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana Willner, Philip Hugenholtz

Abstract

Culture-independent high-throughput sequencing has provided unprecedented insights into microbial ecology, particularly for Earth's most ubiquitous and diverse inhabitants - the viruses. A plethora of methods now exist for amplifying the vanishingly small amounts of nucleic acids in natural viral communities in order to sequence them, and sequencing depth is now so great that viral genomes can be detected and assembled even amid large concentrations of non-viral DNA. Complementing these advances in amplification and sequencing is the ability to physically link fluorescently labeled viruses to their host cells via high-throughput flow sorting. Sequencing of such isolated virus-host pairs facilitates cultivation-independent exploration of the natural host range of viruses. Within the next decade, as these technologies become widespread, we can expect to see a systematic expansion of our knowledge of viruses and their hosts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 5%
Brazil 5 3%
South Africa 2 1%
France 2 1%
Denmark 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 140 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,344,371
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from BioEssays
#359
of 2,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,594
of 198,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioEssays
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.