↓ Skip to main content

Wetland Management Reduces Sediment and Nutrient Loading to the Upper Mississippi River

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Quality, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wetland Management Reduces Sediment and Nutrient Loading to the Upper Mississippi River
Published in
Journal of Environmental Quality, March 2013
DOI 10.2134/jeq2012.0248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca M. Kreiling, Joseph P. Schubauer‐Berigan, William B. Richardson, Lynn A. Bartsch, Peter E. Hughes, Jennifer C. Cavanaugh, Eric A. Strauss

Abstract

Restored riparian wetlands in the Upper Mississippi River basin have potential to remove sediment and nutrients from tributaries before they flow into the Mississippi River. For 3 yr we calculated retention efficiencies of a marsh complex, which consisted of a restored marsh and an adjacent natural marsh that were connected to Halfway Creek, a small tributary of the Mississippi. We measured sediment, N, and P removal through a mass balance budget approach, N removal through denitrification, and N and P removal through mechanical soil excavation. The marsh complex had average retention rates of approximately 30 Mg sediment ha yr, 26 kg total N ha yr, and 20 kg total P ha yr. Water flowed into the restored marsh only during high-discharge events. Although the majority of retention occurred in the natural marsh, portions of the natural marsh were hydrologically disconnected at low discharge due to historical over-bank sedimentation. The natural marsh removed >60% of sediment, >10% of P, and >5% of N loads (except the first year, when it was a N source). The marsh complex was a source of NH and soluble reactive P. The average denitrification rate for the marsh complex was 2.88 mg N m h. Soil excavation removed 3600 Mg of sediment, 5.6 Mg of N, and 2.7 Mg of P from the restored marsh. The marsh complex was effective in removing sediment and nutrients from storm flows; however, retention could be increased if more water was diverted into both restored and natural marshes before entering the river.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 12%
Engineering 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 33%