| Title |
Callous–unemotional traits as a cross-disorders construct
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-012-0513-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre C. M. Herpers, Nanda N. J. Rommelse, Daniëlle M. A. Bons, Jan K. Buitelaar, Floor E. Scheepers |
| Abstract |
Callous-unemotional (CU) traits are currently viewed as the defining signs and symptoms of juvenile psychopathy. It is unclear, however, whether CU traits have validity only in the context of conduct disorder (CD) as proposed by Frick and Moffitt (A proposal to the DSM-V childhood disorders and the ADHD and disruptive behavior disorders work groups to include a specifier to the diagnosis of conduct disorder based on the presence of callous-unemotional traits, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 2010), or also outside CD, either in combination with other forms of psychopathology or as a stand-alone construct. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 17% |
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 97 | 46% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,343,198
of 25,080,267 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#441
of 2,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,976
of 168,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,080,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.