↓ Skip to main content

Do chimpanzees learn reputation by observation? Evidence from direct and indirect experience with generous and selfish strangers

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Do chimpanzees learn reputation by observation? Evidence from direct and indirect experience with generous and selfish strangers
Published in
Animal Cognition, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10071-008-0151-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francys Subiaul, Jennifer Vonk, Sanae Okamoto-Barth, Jochen Barth

Abstract

Can chimpanzees learn the reputation of strangers indirectly by observation? Or are such stable behavioral attributions made exclusively by first-person interactions? To address this question, we let seven chimpanzees observe unfamiliar humans either consistently give (generous donor) or refuse to give (selfish donor) food to a familiar human recipient (Experiments 1 and 2) and a conspecific (Experiment 3). While chimpanzees did not initially prefer to beg for food from the generous donor (Experiment 1), after continued opportunities to observe the same behavioral exchanges, four chimpanzees developed a preference for gesturing to the generous donor (Experiment 2), and transferred this preference to novel unfamiliar donor pairs, significantly preferring to beg from the novel generous donors on the first opportunity to do so. In Experiment 3, four chimpanzees observed novel selfish and generous acts directed toward other chimpanzees by human experimenters. During the first half of testing, three chimpanzees exhibited a preference for the novel generous donor on the first trial. These results demonstrate that chimpanzees can infer the reputation of strangers by eavesdropping on third-party interactions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 33%
Psychology 46 29%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 27 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2013.
All research outputs
#1,542,193
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#363
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,801
of 81,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.