You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limited cross-variant immunity from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron without vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-022-04865-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rahul K. Suryawanshi, Irene P. Chen, Tongcui Ma, Abdullah M. Syed, Noah Brazer, Prachi Saldhi, Camille R. Simoneau, Alison Ciling, Mir M. Khalid, Bharath Sreekumar, Pei-Yi Chen, G. Renuka Kumar, Mauricio Montano, Ronne Gascon, Chia-Lin Tsou, Miguel A. Garcia-Knight, Alicia Sotomayor-Gonzalez, Venice Servellita, Amelia Gliwa, Jenny Nguyen, Ines Silva, Bilal Milbes, Noah Kojima, Victoria Hess, Maria Shacreaw, Lauren Lopez, Matthew Brobeck, Fred Turner, Frank W. Soveg, Ashley F. George, Xiaohui Fang, Mazharul Maishan, Michael Matthay, Mary Kate Morris, Debra Wadford, Carl Hanson, Warner C. Greene, Raul Andino, Lee Spraggon, Nadia R. Roan, Charles Y. Chiu, Jennifer A. Doudna, Melanie Ott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,677 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 241 | 14% |
| Japan | 157 | 9% |
| Canada | 45 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 32 | 2% |
| Brazil | 31 | 2% |
| Italy | 28 | 2% |
| Germany | 15 | <1% |
| Australia | 15 | <1% |
| France | 10 | <1% |
| Other | 119 | 7% |
| Unknown | 984 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1468 | 88% |
| Scientists | 120 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 53 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 34 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1827. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,551
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#586
of 98,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241
of 446,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#27
of 1,013 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,013 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.